Hi Roger, some not so easy questions if I may?
What does this mean, that the robo advisor is based off of decades of Nobel Prize winning research? Eg - Long Term Capital Management had Nobel Prize winning Laureates guiding its investment strategy and it went bust in the late 90's as its models broke down due to market conditions outside the realm of its models.
Also - how does your fiduciary duty obligation jive with your robo advisor, which I assume is an automated process? Are you manually checking each bit of advice it suggests as part of due diligence requirements? And what happens if it has bugs? Eg, if I'm a risk averse investor but your robo advisor had some buggy code and recommends I put 90% of my portfolio into emerging market equities, and I follow this erroneous advice and lose most of my investment, what recourse do I have against your company? Do you guarantee lost capital due to clearly wrong advice, or do I have to take you to court? Just curious how you are planning to deal with this type of situation, because at some point it's likely to happen (but maybe not as obvious as this example).
Also your link appears to be more of an opinion piece than purely factual statement on 401k advisors.