Hacker News Reader

Comment by lancewiggs | Hacker News Reader

What he should do: 1: reopen the API up to everyone, guaranteeing access for 10 years. Let's the clients bloom. 2: reduce rhose costs. Insane. 3: That's it.

View on HN

Although it's a passion point in tech circles, allowing alternative clients is near the bottom of the list of issues Twitter needs to address. Plus it would make any platform changes and their ad system very challenging to successfully implement.

Yeah their API updates a few years back were a huge pain in the ass. For a good 6 months every twitter widget I saw was broken. I replaced widgets on a few sites, and the official replacement always looked & felt shoe-horned because there was so much less control.

and they will make money how? their expenses sure will go up.

Mandatory promoted tweets for 3rd party clients maybe? I use a 3rd party android twitter client due to its superior UX compared to the official app, but I wouldn't mind getting served promoted tweets in that client at all.

I am not sure it would work because I don't believe plain ol' tweets work as an advertising mechanism.

Hence Twitter getting more and more creative with formats: app installs, cards, videos, and have you seen the new "send me spam" ads? http://i.imgur.com/h4H7RQw.png

They can do that, and they can also charge the app suppliers per customer if they don't show the ads. I'd willingly pay to have no ads, better functionality etc.

They make $2 Billion/year already

No they don't. They had $1.4 billion in revenue, so they must have to have profits lower than that. In fact they lost half a billion dollars last year.

https://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATWTR&fstype=ii&ei=qz... <- Income before tax: -578.350.000 USD.

How do they make money?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com