So users wouldn't care if most ads would be popups and autoplay sound, right? Oh, they would? Who is being dishonest then?
So users wouldn't care if most ads would be popups and autoplay sound, right? Oh, they would? Who is being dishonest then?
As I have demonstrated with a simple example, this statement is false.
>Most users would prefer if there would be no ads at all.
Your attempt at moving the goalposts is irrelevant.
Therefore, your accusation of Mozilla being dishonest with their goals is not supported by your arguments.
As a user, you might prefer no ads when asked - but an enormous majority of people have endorsed the ad-supported free-of-charge model on the web through their daily actions. So, practically speaking, we have to find a way to deal with it and make it better.
Yes. I do not agree with this statement. Mozilla as an organization, as a collective of individuals and as a steward of interests of hundreds of millions of Mozilla products users has diverse and complex interests in the direction of evolution of digital advertising. These interests are not limited to the immediate profits.