This is a genuinely scary scenario.
Have there been precedents of profiteering by hiding _something_ invisible to the end-user but with an ulterior purpose into normal consumer electronics?
Have there been precedents of profiteering by hiding _something_ invisible to the end-user but with an ulterior purpose into normal consumer electronics?
How do Global Fortune 500 companies think bundling malware is OK still after all the bad press the last few years?
Half of Silicon Valley is either built on spying on people or selling to those who are spying on people. It's the original sin of social networking.