Is there any loss less binding of XML to s expressions? I've never seen one.
Usually example where I see people rewrite XML to s expressions (like in this thread) are very lossy -- its easy to be pretty by throwing away most of the information!
Usually example where I see people rewrite XML to s expressions (like in this thread) are very lossy -- its easy to be pretty by throwing away most of the information!
I'm not sure what example in this thread you consider to be throwing information away - in a case like
<Term term="slick">
(term "slick"You haven't looked hard enough. Mappging XML to sexprs is trivial:
<tag value=attr ...>content</tag>
-->
((tag value attr ...) content)