Hacker News Reader

> Ideal world, sure, we wouldn't make assumptions about identity based on names. But it happens. I'm not sure that there is an answer that'd make everyone happy, to be honest.

Of course we would, unless in the ideal world names would be uniformly distributed among population in a completely random way. But they're not.

The only problem here is seeing reasonable inference from a known probability distribution as ethically dubious.

View on HN

Wasn't meaning ethics, just the risk of looking silly over time.

If you tend to make a lot of assumptions about someone just from their name before encountering them, then you are pretty much guaranteeing that you are going to get burnt a lot over time, unless you don't meet many people, as it simply isn't that good a guide.

I guess the point I disagree on is that I don't see it as getting burned. If you treat people differently based solely on their name, sure, that can cause problems.

For me when I'm mistaken, it's just a matter of making note of it and moving on. Not a big deal.

I agree. Names just ain't that good of a heuristic.

>Of course we would, unless in the ideal world names would be uniformly distributed among population in a completely random way. But they're not.

That's essentially the same point I was getting at.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com