On the contrary, we should applaud Indonesia for having a system that keeps drug use at low levels.
What I read was about a President who to eager to please a population with a sense of national pride. Indonesia, being a former colony, has obviously a low self esteem and only seem to be able to be ruled by some sort of iron fist which has to show the world that they are really smart, clever and "sovereign".
Whether or not the death penalty should have been applied and whether or not this "cures" the drug problem is not really the discussion (I believe). That a small group of people had to sacrifice their lives for political gain, and to prove a point, seems to be a more interesting discussion here.
I certainly hope Widodo and his henchmen will be brought in front of an international court to clarify themselves over this.
They didn't "sacrifice" their lives, they were drug dealers and found guilty by the courts in Indonesia. There's nothing heroic about dying for this cause.
Furthermore it is widely known that Indonesia executes drug dealers no matter where they happen to come from and the Australians surely have known about this "business risk".
I'm against the death penalty but I recognize that I have no say about Indonesian laws. This is their own sovereign decision to make. If you don't like this then don't try to sell/import crystal meth or heroin in Indonesia.
The latter seems to be happening in Egypt. People are being sentenced to death en masse, hundreds in a single judicial session, on vague charges of rioting: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/04/egyptians-r...
There are wrongly convicted people on American death rows: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-32178121
The death penalty opens a door for the darkest kind of abuse by states against their people. It should not be used as punishment anywhere.
I don't disagree with you that the Australians must have known the risks and they chose to go ahead anyway, that was stupid. It is also Indonessia's perogative to enforce their chosen laws as they see fit. But there are political reasons why this whole situation has gone down the way it did, and those reasons are more to do with certain Indonesian politicians wanting to look like strong men in front of their electorates and the international community than it is about any specifics of this case with the Australians in particular.
1. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/indonesia-got-its-...
1) In relation to the two Australians, the Indonesian judges were ordered by Jakatra not to take bribes but hand out the death penalty which I like to see questioned in an international court.
2) The two Australians were taking drug "OUT" of Indonesia. It doesn't make it right, but a death penalty? It's obvious there are other motives here, which again, I'd like to see questioned in an International court.
3) The only reason the Indonesian authorities were able to apprehend the Australians (9 at the time) was because they were tipped off by the Australian Federal Police, not because of their own competence, which is yet another reason why this must be questioned in an international court. Why did the AFP not simply arrest them on their arrival in Australia? This is obviously the Australian government doing a favour to the Indonesian government. One can only speculate the motives (terrorism?)
To your point about not having a say in Indonesian law, you're somewhat shortsighted. There are diplomatic means of influence such as sanctions and other agreements.
Furthermore, as an individual we have a right and an obligation to advocate for what we believe in, regardless of legal jurisdiction. That's how our global society evolves.
We all make mistakes in our lives and most of us are not the same persons we were before we made those mistakes.
Your reasoning is misguided.