I've often wondered if the "gas bubble" theory was only partially correct, as there are different kinds of pops and cracks with different sounds and sensations (including pain).
I've often wondered if the "gas bubble" theory was only partially correct, as there are different kinds of pops and cracks with different sounds and sensations (including pain).
I've been doing that, also with my right foot, since high school.
I also have another sort of cracking where the refractory period is weeks, rather than ~20 minutes. I suspect this is another phenomenon as well, though I don't know what it might be. I experience this in my wrists, sometimes sternum (perhaps snapping cartilage in the xiphoid process? I really try to avoid this one.)
My elbows also crack when I hyperextend them. The refractory period there is probably somewhere between 20 minutes and an hour, but I'm not convinced that is the gas bubble thing either.
If you can snap your ankle every time you move it in a particular way, it is probably not the same thing. I have never been able to pop the same joint twice in rapid succession. Indeed, that's why I pop so many different joints. Once you've done them all, there's no choice but to wait.
I'd certainly be wary of pops emanating from joints without a great deal of natural range of motion, or those so wrapped up in muscles and ligaments it is practically impossible to isolate any one joint in particular. If you experience any pain while joint-popping, stop doing it, immediately.
Second method, you put your back against a hard, flat surface and push yourself into it. This one may only pop one or two at a time. And you might break your furniture.
I'd love to know, in laymans terms, the repercussions to doing this. As far as I could gather from the article, it doesn't sound like any long-term effects.
One other question I have, though, is why is it "easier" to crack these parts over time? The more I do it, the easier it is to repeat in the future. Am I just creating this space, and making it easier to "fill" with every "distraction", as the article called it?
1: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/crack-research/