PolicyCompass, for example, lives at https://github.com/policycompass
Carneades lives at http://github.com/carneades
MARKOS is up on SF http://markosproject.sourceforge.net/
PolicyCompass, for example, lives at https://github.com/policycompass
Carneades lives at http://github.com/carneades
MARKOS is up on SF http://markosproject.sourceforge.net/
That being said OpenSource is explicitly mentioned in many calls. I'm mostly working on country specific calls but they are usually constructed similarly. OpenSource is often mentioned as a "potential use after the project" or a "result". Interestingly the provided headlines for calls will often read like this: "Potential use (for example OpenSource, patents, marketable product)" :D
+Actual software development usually isn't the goal of research projects. In the EU they use maturity levels (initially from the aviation industry I think) and it's quite a bit more "actual software/solutions" focused than the country specific calls (by design). Overall anyone who has worked in software development or even better at a startup would get a good chuckle out of these research funding events and the general process btw. (my personal opinion).
I met a couple of developers employed and contracted by the EU / Parliament, I really don't want to generalise this but they did not seem the type that would work on such software that you linked to...or the type that would actually recommend OpenBSD..or even actually know what OpenBSD is.
I'd expect the upcoming (pan)"European Open Data Portal" to receive significantly more PR from the EU.