So, are you shooting for a subsistence income level for ALL humans?
I don't know why we should work for 60 hrs/w with no OT compensation to feed the planet when the 1% of Earth's population are hoarding over 35% of global wealth if not more.
Maybe you should talk to them and convince them to give some of that wealth back to the poor so they don't starve to death?
'Wealth', in the context you speak of it, is an illusion. Your question:
>Maybe you should talk to them and convince them to give some of that wealth back to the poor so they don't starve to death?
Is non-sensical. A person cannot eat 'wealth', just as one of the other responders cannot eat his employer's bank credits.
It's not a strawman, it's essentially what the person I was responding to claimed:
>Maybe you should talk to them and convince them to give some of that wealth back to the poor so they don't starve to death?
The real strawman is the specious concept of 'wealth' that is being perpetrated here.