This has nothing to do with anti-trust and everything to do with extracting a kilo of flesh from a successful non-EU company.
This has nothing to do with anti-trust and everything to do with extracting a kilo of flesh from a successful non-EU company.
"Professor Armentano thoroughly researches the classic cases in antitrust law and demonstrates a surprising gap between the stated aims of antitrust law and what it actually accomplishes in the real world. Instead of protecting competition, Professor Armentano finds, antitrust law actually protects certain politically-favored competitors. This is an essential work for anyone wishing to understand the limitations and problems of contemporary antitrust actions." http://www.amazon.com/Antitrust-Monopoly-Anatomy-Independent...
I think you misunderstood what the OP said
That leads me to believe these laws are "not strictly applied" but politically applied.
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm
I think you'll find the overwhelming majority are European companies.
It has everything to do with anti-trust. Google's near-monopoly on search is dangerous, and they've abused it multiple times. Google News and Yelp are good examples: they would steal content (not just link to it as they'd have you believe), then threaten to delist the victim's sites if they complained.