Well this fell from number 5 article pretty quick. I've noticed this happening heaps with articles about sexism. Why is that?
We're open to turning the flags off if people feel that the article and/or thread is particularly good.
Edit: Based on user feedback via email, I've turned off the flags. We've also closed the threads to noob accounts. I hate doing that, but sometimes it's the only way to deal with trolls. Anyone with a new account who wants to participate civilly in the thread is welcome to email us.
That said, unkilling this is just wrong. This sort of drivel is what I'd expect on Tumblr -- nit picking minor things, focusing on people's phrasing rather than meaning, not accepting common terminology as if that advances some sort of social justice, and asking people (inherently Bayesian creatures) to ignore their priors for the sake of "equality".
These articles detract from the real issues, and serve only to further separate women in technology, rather than integrating them. There's a reason this was flag killed (and it was not sexism).
Also it is discouraging people from calling software "sexy", and I support that -- because it is just annoying and sounds like something lame marketing people would say.
But the community is divided on this issue. Many users flag these stories, but many other users care deeply about them. Those users are also a valuable part of HN. They argue that if we never turn off the flags then we are de facto taking this issue off the table (or allowing a segment of the community to do so). That may be a bit exaggerated—some stories about sexism and/or gender in tech do stay on the front page despite flags—but it's still a fair point. Whatever you think about these questions, they're not off-topic for HN the way most politics are. Moreover, many HN users who make this case are active members who participate in lots of threads. They're not just trying to use HN to further an agenda.
If we had better software, maybe it would all balance out in a way that didn't require any intervention, but that's not where we're at (and in fairness is a pretty hard problem). In cases where the software leads to unrepresentative outcomes, it's our job to adjust. Is this article the best one for that? I don't know, but given that the thread turned out to be a vigorous discussion that managed not to be horrible, I think it was an ok call.
If only this were true.
Can you elaborate on why, given that apparently a large portion of the people who saw this flagged it (relative to most articles), you decided to override the flags? Would you do the same for an article which was misogynistic instead of misandristic? Or, if you don't agree with my labels, can you elaborate on whether this is a viewpoint-based unflagging, and whether promoting specific viewpoints is considered a part of HN moderation?