Unrelated, but I've never understood why t.co counts against your tweet length.. for example, if you tweeted "ebay.c.uk", it would count for length(http://t.co/xxxxxxxxxx) characters (15 characters even though you only typed 9).
Quite optimistic :-) especially since the situation has gotten worse by two characters since then.
They very well could simply take min(len(t.co/url), len(orig_url)) without breaking any past tweets or changing the 140 character limit's spirit. It would just behave more logically.
So why do they do it here?
Of those, x is currently timing out, q redirects to some kind of customer-only login wall, and z is the winner as the only normal public-facing website on a single-letter .com.
I wonder if eBay still owns x.com, having been Elon Musk's PayPal precursor. If so, it's a staggering oversight to leave the domain dormant.
Yes they do. Although, I do recall x.com being online not too long ago.