Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

kolev

It's a pity that we have RethinkDB and ArangoDB, but MongoDB still owns the mindsets...

View on HN

While it has many features, it severely lacks on the "custom-column-sharding" + "range-sharding" compared to mongodb.

Since rethink-guys are always in these threads:

What is your opinion on implementing compression/tokumx ?

What about custom-column-sharding, range-sharding, regex-sharding (redislabs has done this)?

We currently support range sharding by primary key.

Both compression and custom sharding are things we definitely want to do (https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/1862 , possibly https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/364).

I can't give an ETA on these features yet, but it will probably happen later this year.

That means you'll REMOVE range-sharding right? I just thought that issue was already completed.

Uncertain. The issue is still in the planning phase. We'll only remove range sharding if we're confident that hash-based sharding provides an adequate replacement of course. It's possible we'll keep both.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com