A contrary opinion: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/18/the_inside_story_of_...
It's a shame because what used to be a useful source is now just noise. Maybe he's right in this case, but who would ever know?
So it replaces variance with consistent mediocrity: the McDonalds of websites.
This was the old directgov site: https://i.imgur.com/s7lHXGD.png
This is the new gov.uk site: https://i.imgur.com/IgyTCLL.png
Which do you think does a better job of presenting the information?