>who runs their own email server? :)
Anyone who cares about privacy? :)
Qmail is too old to be usable these days, but Postfix does at least use its security model. It isn't perfect, but arguably the best mail server around for that reason.
Anyone who cares about privacy? :)
Qmail is too old to be usable these days, but Postfix does at least use its security model. It isn't perfect, but arguably the best mail server around for that reason.
Hilary Clinton
With regard to age, both qmail and Postfix were written around 1998.
For my purposes, qmail works just fine. I use it; therefore it is "useable".
For me, Postfix is overkill. Not fact, just my opinion. Personal preference.
In the event I want to change something, I find it easier to modify and recompile qmail than I do to modify and recompile Postfix.
Postfix has been updated (latest stable release February 8, 2015). Qmail doesn't get updated because DJB considers it complete (last [official] stable release June 15, 1998). There are custom third-party patches you can compile into qmail, so I guess those could be considered updates.
Well, it depends on the feature set you need, but to a level that most people might consider fact.
From memory, no support for TLS connections, SMTP AUTH, or SPF/DKIM on mail. That, plus it has very limited support in general and needs an arcane collection of patches to remain workable.
Other mail servers can work around its restrictions, yes, but that doesn't make it fit for purpose.