"I think that's enough to critique your original way of phrasing the problem."

Then I don't think much of your thinking.

Making up scenarios that are trivially refuted by a moment's thought is silly. How about

4) Aliens come down every night and surgically remove the bits of women's brains that are used in programming tasks.

There, now I've really addressed the issue. See why 'making stuff up' isn't actually some mark of intellectual superiority?

Or how about

1) How many jobs that are known for attracting socially adjusted, good looking men can you name where most of the winners are women?

2) How many high social status, well varied jobs can you name where most of the winners are women?

3) You defeat your point in your own parentheses.

You've addressed nothing. You've made up some nonsense and pretended to be smarter than the person you're responding to, but you've directly avoided addressing the actual point.