They were just discussing it on chat today: http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/6/15-16
I've never gotten involved in Chat before, either, but just searching the most active chatroom for `cv-` brought that up immediately.
They were just discussing it on chat today: http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/6/15-16
I've never gotten involved in Chat before, either, but just searching the most active chatroom for `cv-` brought that up immediately.
Unless it's offensive in some way, this seems like a terribly short-sighted way of handling bad questions. Ask questions back or offer suggestions for improving the question. Closing or deleting it doesn't teach the person anything, and it doesn't help the community.
So it might be useful to bias the site toward leaving questions open, and let people make weighted votes for closing. Initially, the weight of a vote would be zero. This would allow the quality of an individual's judgement to be established, and their vote given more weight as it proved to be more predictive of whether or not an issue was eventually closed.
There's a balance of rights / responsibilities, and if you have the right to closevote questions and earn magical rep points, you have the responsibility to explain why and try to help.
Herd-mentality and behaviour (demonstrated as closevote requests) seem like the opposite of this.
Rude comments and inappropriate downvotes sounds like a community issue - why are those not punished or otherwise dis-incentivized?
Maybe they need a metamod function.
They mean well, but it does feel a bit like a mob at times.
The Room Owners have felt for a while now that it can sometimes get out of hand, that's why we had this discussion in our Room Meeting. As davidism has mentioned, we've put some extra guidelines down now. The main one being that unless it's necessary (something like spam, offensive, dupe, etc, where the OP isn't going to be able to improve the post) we're adding a 10 minute "grace period" before requesting a cv-pls. This gives OPs the chance to edit their question, to respond to comments, etc.
I disagree with a few of your points, but I'm not really interested in getting drawn into a debate here. If you want to discuss it further then drop by chat.
I know you've come into the room in the past to ask/speak about some particular cv-pls. If, in the future, you have anything to bring up, come and speak to us.