He basically admits his model is no better than a monkey
He basically admits his model is no better than a monkey
Ie, if his model consistently predicts success of those companies deep in the right tail (ie, your Facebooks and Twitters), but is less correct about just 'mildly' successful startups, the algorithm will greatly outperform a coin flip.
Furthermore, the models should probably be described as forecasts and not predictions, and as such can't be right or wrong. Which is mainly just to emphasize that the statement is an oversimplification.
Well, technically, a monkey with a coin to flip. "Heads this startup will succeed, tails it will fail"
5% of startups will be predicted to succeed and will succeed (correct prediction)
5% of startups will be predicted to fail and will succeed (false prediction)
45% of startups will be predicted to succeed and will fail(false prediction)
45% of startups will be predicted to fail and will fail (true prediction)
50% true predictions, 50% false predictions. A coin flip is always 50% accurate.