I have a problem with the 'likely' part, because that's where the 'paranoid' comes into play.
What evidence is there that it's likely, other than paranoia?
What evidence is there that it's likely, other than paranoia?
It seems to me as if the purpose of bringing it up is to warn people that any opinion they encounter of a certain kind can't be trusted, because it's probably part of a coordinated campaign of government manipulation. That's a couple of steps away from calling it thoughtcrime.