Hacker News Reader

Comment by haney | Hacker News Reader

I totally agree that the free market should set salaries for talented people, but consider the case when a startup is winding down and looking for a soft landing, if the acquirer picks up the top employees and ruins the last bit of hope the company has then the non "rockstar" employees would all be out of jobs and have nothing but a failed company on their resume to show for it. Also, and I may be biased but it feels like bullying on the part of a bigger company with more capital but without the ability to find equivalent talent without coming in the back door of a smaller company.

View on HN

> if the acquirer picks up the top employees and ruins the last bit of hope the company has then the non "rockstar" employees would all be out of jobs

Sounds like a merit-based scenario to me.

Simply reading through HN for several years, it seems pretty obvious to me that many startups view employees and "theirs". There is no scenario where I would hurt my future opportunities simply so I don't hurt my (sinking) company's.

I owe nothing more than the agreed-upon work for money to my current company, and watching out for #1 is what has been so successful for me these past several years.

A smart developer would stay at current company if she truly believed there was a successful acquisition on the horizon. If she leaves with someone else, that's just the free market talking.

It's not merit-based. If I'm an acquirer playing hardball the value of hiring those people is the damage to the acquired's valuation with other suitors and not anything to do with the peoples' abilities.

Let's say you're selling, I'm buying, and we reach a tentative agreement for $100M. While you're winding down your other options I talk to five of your key people and hire them each for $2M. The next morning I start in fresh: Without those people our new offer is $50M. By the way that's a generous offer, part of the team works for us so you're worth even less to other acquirers. And hey, what if the press got wind that you were trying to sell and your key people were leaving. Sounds like a company in trouble.

You might say that's an asshole thing that nobody would actually do but there's a reason the poster up top suggested covering it.

Looks like the equity the startup offered those employees was clearly not enough to keep them around if the big company was so easily able to poach them while their equity was literally in the process of being turned into actual dollars. Being horribly cheap with equity to employees is endemic in startups, maybe that will change it. So, still not seeing the problem here.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com