You could create more tenured prof positions with more funding, which would obviously help right?
What if there's a limited social capacity to do science? As in, at any given time there's it's only worth it to allow some percentage of people to do science (and not all of them will be doing science). Throwing more money at the problem will only muddy the waters by drowning out the good voices with junk, and what you will see is thousands of journals, and more fraud and bad science percolating through the upper journals. Hmm...
but "more fraud and bad science" seems (to me) to be excaerbated by increased pressure for limited funding, rather than the opposite.