Except a) that torture in the report didn't last for a few minutes and b) that it's less effective than other methods and more likely to obtain false information.

So if I only had a couple hours and actually wanted to save my family, I'd probably try to do something that would actually make a difference.

Would you allow your parents or children to be misidentified and wrongly tortured out of the false view that torture is the most effective interrogation/investigation approach?

Note also that the CIA had to really claim some kind of permanent unknown ticking time bomb of unknown nature, but after they used that justification, held a suspect they ignored for 40 days before torturing them.

A false sense of urgency at an unknown threat is not a rational justification for torture (I'd argue that if we were rational we'd never justify it), but once you permit torture, it opens the door to all kinds of terrible, immoral, and ineffective tactics.

The world doesn't work like the television show 24.