Hacker News Reader

Addressing you and some other grandchild comments:

This is why we have a navy, not to mention the supporting apparatus of land-, sea-, and space-based monitoring of the air and seas.

Unless this thing is placed under a heavily-trafficked air route, attacks from non-state groups are unlikely to succeed, as the divergent flight-path of a commercial airliner will set off alarms.

And state actors would be declaring war by attacking this thing.

View on HN

And state actors would be declaring war by attacking this thing.

France didn't declare war on New Zealand with the Rainbow Warrior bombing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_Rainbow_Warrior

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing

Divers attaching charges to the hull would be another low-tech way to take a vessel like this down. Low tech mines would probably do a pretty good job too.

That was at port, though. This ship is planned to spend 25 years at sea. Certainly a ship carrying divers would have to get close enough so as to be obvious.

This thing will be permantently moored in a part of the planet reknowned for the ferocity of the cyclones it gets each season.

Mother Nature will be attacking it too, and the designers know it. So it would probably have to be big mine.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com