The report seems surprised that Facebook failed to hand the guy over to the authorities because he said he wanted to kill a soldier online. They'd be reporting half the teenagers in the world if they were forced to do so
The report seems surprised that Facebook failed to hand the guy over to the authorities because he said he wanted to kill a soldier online. They'd be reporting half the teenagers in the world if they were forced to do so
The way things stand, I agree that there's currently a big rush in the UK to approve wider snooping laws
> The report seems surprised that Facebook failed to hand the guy over to the authorities because he said he wanted to kill a soldier online.
Facebook had already taken down several of his accounts because they were deemed offensive and used to spread terror stuff (videos/hate speech). The ISC report says Facebook took the content offline and didn't forward the matter to the authorities.
These laws have been fully rejected once and will not pass in the current government. What the heck news are you even reading if you don't know this?
Or so this is what I gather based on the ISC report describing the MI6's monitoring of the two terrorists who killed the soldier.