> InfoBitt does not create original facts. The site curates and organizes news as it breaks.
I think that is the point. If Infobitt gets the readers and revenue, who will pay the originators of facts?
In the wonderful event that Infobitt becomes a superior product and accordingly gains market share to the detriment of news sources, then we will of course know where our bread is buttered. Infobitt will suck without good sources; so probably we'll end up paying our sources ourselves.
Some readers of The Information, The Wall Street Journal, Economist, Financial Times, Bloomberg terminal owners, The New York Times.
And you can have conferences like TechCrunch.
The day an original news content provider had a reason to approach InfoBitt for revenue sharing would be quite a milestone for InfoBitt.