Nice try, but no.
"On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield gains and pesticide reductions are larger for insect-resistant crops than for herbicide-tolerant crops. Yield and profit gains are higher in developing countries than in developed countries." (emphasis mine)
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone...
"Study of 100 Billion Animals Finds GMOs Safe"
http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/comprehensive-s...
"A recent study has shown that for those with non-Celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), the gluten itself might not be to blame for GI troubles."
http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/does-non-celia...
"Organic food no more nutritious than conventionally grown food"
http://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/organic-food-no-more-nutr...
...
Admittedly, the issue of organic food is more controversial than the others. There was also a study showing that organic foods had higher levels of antioxidants: http://www.latimes.com/science/la-sci-organic-foods-20140715...
But given the amount of money people spend on organic food and the level of enthusiasm for it, you would think it cured cancer--not that there was inconclusive evidence that it might have somewhat higher levels of antioxidants and lower levels of pesticide residue. In any case, antioxidants can be supplemented, much more cheaply than buying organic food. But that doesn't provide the level of enjoyment (or for some people, the pseudo-religious experience) of buying organic produce.
And THAT is as complex as I think the issue is. The term "cargo cult" hits close enough to the mark, for me.