I have a hard time understanding why a test pilot would risk their life so that Jerry Seinfeld can fly to the edge of the atmosphere and back.
I have a hard time understanding why a test pilot would risk their life so that Jerry Seinfeld can fly to the edge of the atmosphere and back.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/cirque-du-soleil-da...
I suspect that the test pilot who gets to fly a new kind of spaceplane finds it more gratifying than the acrobat who does the same show every night for a decade.
And for many, being on stage is every bit as exciting as flying a space ship. The emotional energy from a good performance is amazing. (It's certainly not the pay that keeps them)
There are lots of motivations in life and nationalism is only one reason. Personally, I don't think nationalism is good for motivating people towards more than warfare. I would argue that even the Apollo Program wasn't motivated by nationalism (it merely exploited nationalism for budget and attention) – its real motivation was true to the George Mallory explanation for risking his life climbing Everest: because it's there.
I do understand doing things to reach the edge of space because its there. For the engineering interest. To change people's perspective about what is difficult and what is easy. To make people look towards space instead of towards their borders and flags.
People have stopped thinking that progress can be made in space. Virgin Galactic and other commercial space companies are trying to change that. Sending rich people to space is simply a funding model.
That's a bold statement. You don't think it might be an adreneline rush / wanting to push your body to its very limits kind of thing?