By the way, these constants are no more 'universal' than the speed of light itself.
By the way, these constants are no more 'universal' than the speed of light itself.
So we resort to what we know, which is what we see. We can't see more than the surrounding universe, but we can try extrapolating from what seems to work. Attempting to stifle that inquiry seems a bit... I dunno, pointlessly antagonistic.
This article shows science in action, doing what it does best: taking observations and reconciling them with other observations via theory, and then fixing theory to match. It seems our universe follows certain equations which are themselves dimensionful, so I'm not sure why we wouldn't attempt to benchmark the universe against itself - we don't have much else to use. Even dimensionless numbers are only marginally useful, like alpha; it may "exist" and manifest as our universe, but it's not especially predictive.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FITJMJjASUs (one of my favorite videos - I still don't grok it, but I'm getting closer!)