Agree. Patent language is way too confusing. Hopefully the Supreme Court's ruling in Nautilus v. Biosig will force lawyers to clarify their patent language. From Justice Ginsburg:

> we hold that a patent is invalid for indefiniteness if its claims, read in light of the specification delineating the patent, and the prosecution history, fail to inform, with reasonable certainty, those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention.

https://medium.com/patents-technology-law/good-news-in-the-f...