Does a HOA provide garbage removal, street maintenance, etc?
Does a HOA provide garbage removal, street maintenance, etc?
The cynical answer is that HOAs are legal fictions set up to shelter building developers from the financial burdens and liabilities of having to pay for, or be on the hook for, any of those services or maintenance needs. HOAs are the greatest invention in favor of real estate developers since the timeshare.
Where I live the HOA board only gets to decide on the 'small stuff' (for big purchases like said Pool renewal above they still need a majority vote.) I try to 'activate' HOA members (everyone that contributes) and remember them that a HOA is made up of its members in the end. If you don't like anything about it you should either talk with your HOA representative / board member AND/OR contribute by opting to become a board member yourself.
Source: I'm one of the five HOA board members in our small (60apt) apartment building.
Some HOAs operate by pretty weak by-laws, and can only decide trivial things. Others have obnoxious levels of control.
Typically an HOA board consists of community members or home owners (if that's the type of development), and sometimes a company that either developed (and owns) the neighborhood or one that manages it will have seats.
Some HOA boards are easy to toss out, others are not.
The vast potential variances make it important to try to get to know more about the HOA ahead of time if you're thinking about moving into a development with such.
The sale of the residence includes (and requires) contracting with the HOA.
> probably some obscure law
No need for laws, you've signed a contract.
So why in the hell would you sign that sort of deal in the first place? Well, if you don't have to, you shouldn't. But in some cities, such as SF, it's extremely hard to buy a condo that doesn't come with an HOA.
HOAs are as prevalent as they are because in most cases they are highly beneficial, both legally and financially, to building or subdivision developers. So more and more developers are using them.
You buy from the developer or the previous owner.
> And surely if you own them, they have no legal right to tell you want to do unless it breaks the law?
Membership to the HOA is required by and included into the building sale, contracts are binding.
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_%28law%29#Covenants_re...
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_%28law%29#Covenants_in...
Like many bureaucracies, they survived the obsolescence of their original purpose. They provide little beyond (sometimes) a way to arbitrate homeowner disputes.
http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/covenants.htm
> They have zero say about who can and cannot live in a given area.
Because they've been barred to by the Fair Housing Act of 1968.
Sadly, I think any time you have amateurs involved with administration and decision making, you cop the resulting amateur politics and it can quickly make the process miserable.
I wonder if somehow anonymising the process and removing personalities could even help? Leave it purely about the issues, funds and votes?