How does "It rain tomorrow" not indicate a concept of the future?
For that matter, how does "It rain tomorrow" not indicate a phrase in the original language that might as well have been translated into English as "It will rain tomorrow"?
For that matter, how does "It rain tomorrow" not indicate a phrase in the original language that might as well have been translated into English as "It will rain tomorrow"?
And while you very well could make the translation from whatever the original was to "It will rain tomorrow," it might not be a literal one that preserves the original tenses, which would obscure exactly what he was trying to point out.
It's obviously got at least one word for the future ("tomorrow"), which is kind of like having a library function strcat instead of just +
Also, English doesn't have a future tense, so there's that.
Has happened, is happening, will happen?
But they said it as if one does.