>> In the general case, it's really easy to detect
> Why do you say that? I've worked hard on this problem and would not call it easy.
Are there reference data sets for this problem? If not, you or reddit should publish data sets.
> Why do you say that? I've worked hard on this problem and would not call it easy.
Are there reference data sets for this problem? If not, you or reddit should publish data sets.
I suppose the fact that there's already a detection algorithm biases the data, but it'd still be better than nothing.