The article is about power, not money. Also, there's no suggested course of action. In fact, a legitimate course of action could be "stop using Google's services so that if shit hits the fan, they don't have your data".
How could enlightened self-interest of consumers ever possibly be construed as an assault on liberty (or whatever-the-hell)?
It's really best never to think of those you disagree with in terms of flat caricatures.
Please don't—even when the other person is being provocative.
edit: Pretty sure not eating McDonald's every day is not an affront to capitalism. To assume that critics of McDonald's food are automatically calling for regulation/whatever, instead of just trying to educate people to help them act in their self-interest, is a caricature. Similarly, suggesting any critic of Google is automatically some sort of proto-communist is a ridiculous caricature.
Read the book and you'll know...
To the extent that you're correct, you're just discrediting Rand as a true private sector authoritarian.
edit: I've read the book.