> Kudos for building something but I'd rather stick with the battle tested version thanks...
Thanks. And what you say is only reasonable. I wouldn't imagine Sentinel.js to be any where near as stable as Angular.js. I rewrote the whole thing three times, to get the code in a manageable form. There are tests that cover most of the functionality. Since there are only a handful of directives, there are actually less 'moving parts' than something big like angular.js. But still, there are a lot of things that can go wrong for some combination of directives.
And can you please tell me which example you found more complicated than the angular version? Also can you think of any use case that something like this would fail to meet?