Hacker News Reader

But what is $x? Integer? String? Character? Some_Object?

How do you evaluate this, depends on the context. Wasn't that the whole point of a dynamic language anyway?

After learning Haskell, I'm not sure what the benefits of dynamic typing are anymore.

No, not at all. Type coercion is orthogonal to type safety.

Amen, brother! I call this "weak typing". But some others use weak typing to mean different things (like "unsafe typing") [1].

Javascript, PHP and Perl are weakly typed. Smalltalk, Lisp, Python, Ruby... are strong typed. But all of them are dynamic.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_and_weak_typing#Predicta...

I love dynamic languages with strong typing. You get most of the dev time developments, but without the inherent subtle bugs that creep in via automatic type coercion.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com