Hacker News Reader

Comment by MichaelApproved | Hacker News Reader

> I wager all by itself costs more than paving a traditional road.

Compared to a single road paving, the hi-tech road is more expensive but this road is supposed to be more durable than traditional paved roads. That means you need to compare the cost of several road pavings to get a more accurate comparison.

The hi-tech road is supposed to be installed once for several decades, where paved roads are re-paved every few years. This increases the cost of the traditional paved road.

Also, these hi-tech roads are supposed to subsidize their cost with energy creation.

> If there was demand for putting more utility wires underground wouldn't they already be simply burying them which is much less expensive?

Burying power lines is expensive. On its own, too expensive but combined with this project, it could be fiscally sound.

View on HN

The key word is "supposed". If glass tiles were a good choice for road surfaces, I'd expect we'd have seen them in use by now. If it's just economics that have stopped glass tile use in roadways, I'm still dubious that the energy production from these units will come close to offsetting the additional expense.

> If glass tiles were a good choice for road surfaces, I'd expect we'd have seen them in use by now.

These types of attitudes don't help push forward innovation.

This is what R&D is for.

The first part of R&D is research, implying "research if this is even possible". The point people are making it's far from clear that this will work, so it's silly to assume that it will work a priori given the obvious engineering challenges.

Humans have been researching and developing road surfaces for a few millennia now. It's going to be very expensive to find plausible materials that haven't already been tried.

Especially clear ones.

paved roads are re-paved every few years

This is not my experience. I've lived near a secondary arterial road for nearly 9 years, and have never seen repaving done on it. It's still in fine condition.

I live in Michigan and the roads are repaved what seems like every other year. After each winter, there are potholes the size of craters on the moon. Very dangerous when everyone is swerving into incoming traffic and slamming on breaks to avoid them.

In my limited understanding, the frequency of required maintenance depends heavily on weather conditions, and also on the size of vehicles who commonly travel on the road. Trucks cause orders of magnitude more wear on roads than cars do.

Weather conditions it is, then. It doesn't snow here, though it rains a lot. But if snow is a problem, then a solar road makes much less sense anyway.

> The hi-tech road is supposed to be installed once for several decades, where paved roads are re-paved every few years.

We're comparing the cost of solar panels to the cost of pouring some shit onto the ground... I'd assume that difference is far more than tenfold?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com