How is this any different from, say, all the furor when Apple releases a new product, or Google unveils a future technology, or TechCrunch gets called out for doing something dumb? Social news is given shape by social waves.
It's not the volume of stories, it's the tone of the comments.
I do find it silly that this has become so fevered in 24 hours' time. I'd find it hilarious if two days from know _why set up his Twitter and his web site again and was all, "Hey guys, I'm back, how you doing."
Hell, if there's one thing we do know it's that we didn't get to see _why in his early developing years. When he joined the community, he was already a bright, talented guy with an assortment of interests. It's harder to look at somebody and figure out what they were thinking if you've only ever seen them when they were fairly mature.
I can't even parse that...
EDIT: Oh, I could actually check your profile. Some people fill those out.
"Going on about <something>" is an idiom I've encountered in Texas and seems common throughout the Southeastern US as well. You can get the essential meaning by thinking of it as a shortening of "Going on at length about <something>" with strong implication of excessive length, though it can be (and often is) used to apply to whole discussions among multiple people.
http://download.microsoft.com/download/B/D/5/BD51FFB2-C777-4...
I can only wince and wonder where I even start?
It's like a C# developer trying to reinvent Erlang... Poorly. And using a needlessly verbose syntax.
Just tell them they're Doing It Wrong.
There's an awful lot of it these day, I'm expecting Oprah or someone like her to realize the potential of this real soon now.
Dvorak, Sethi, now this guy _why (_why not ? _who cares ?)
When Hans Reiser turned murderer I think it was newsworthy, most of the rest of this IT Drama stuff is just as interesting as Britneys latest tantrum.