_why: "Goodbye until I can shake this."
mislav.uniqpath.com
mislav.uniqpath.com
"...and I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you crazy kids!"
How is this any different from, say, all the furor when Apple releases a new product, or Google unveils a future technology, or TechCrunch gets called out for doing something dumb? Social news is given shape by social waves.
It's not the volume of stories, it's the tone of the comments.
I do find it silly that this has become so fevered in 24 hours' time. I'd find it hilarious if two days from know _why set up his Twitter and his web site again and was all, "Hey guys, I'm back, how you doing."
Hell, if there's one thing we do know it's that we didn't get to see _why in his early developing years. When he joined the community, he was already a bright, talented guy with an assortment of interests. It's harder to look at somebody and figure out what they were thinking if you've only ever seen them when they were fairly mature.
I can't even parse that...
EDIT: Oh, I could actually check your profile. Some people fill those out.
"Going on about <something>" is an idiom I've encountered in Texas and seems common throughout the Southeastern US as well. You can get the essential meaning by thinking of it as a shortening of "Going on at length about <something>" with strong implication of excessive length, though it can be (and often is) used to apply to whole discussions among multiple people.
http://download.microsoft.com/download/B/D/5/BD51FFB2-C777-4...
I can only wince and wonder where I even start?
It's like a C# developer trying to reinvent Erlang... Poorly. And using a needlessly verbose syntax.
Just tell them they're Doing It Wrong.
There's an awful lot of it these day, I'm expecting Oprah or someone like her to realize the potential of this real soon now.
Dvorak, Sethi, now this guy _why (_why not ? _who cares ?)
When Hans Reiser turned murderer I think it was newsworthy, most of the rest of this IT Drama stuff is just as interesting as Britneys latest tantrum.
Tall Fox: -Have you noticed that this book is basically written by a _lunatic_?
Short Fox: -Yup
Tall Fox: -Seriously, he's way too hyperactive. If he keeps at this frantic pace he's gonna burn out quick.
Short Fox: -Burn out? He's gonna shoot himself in the head by the time he hits 30.
--
From that kind of comment and the pace of his work (bouts of rabid coding interspersed with AWOL periods), I'm afraid he's bipolar. His only output (code, writing, mailing list contributions) in june was a single tweet saying that he was trapped in a labyrinth of his own design.
I sincerely hope he's alright.
http://mislav.uniqpath.com/poignant-guide/images/departure.p...
"Ha! I was right! He flipped his lid! He's all burned out and he's going to shoot himself in the head!"
On the bright side, from the little psychology and the little about _why's author that I know, he doesn't seem to fit a psychological profile of someone who would kill himself. I'm sure he works a lot, and his work is curiously personal and I'd imagine exhausting, but his work is also well recognized and celebrated. Many artists don't have that luxury in their lifetimes.
-
"and i go home and draw cats and doctors in space. without the medication. i'm a stiff. an upright. i'll never pass a joint. maybe mj works, maybe mj's death. i have too much mental illness in my blood to find out. narco+alco have turned kooky people i love into obliterated people i love. god, god, god, please keep her alive. (if i'm lucky maybe god will let a horse run by.)
families are a network of lost packets and bad routing. cause you got spouses on the vpn. it's not all that bad, but it's fun to moan, ya know."
-
While there are some errements, these themes are far too recurrent to just be whimsical.
There are other allusions to him leaving the scene/dying in other writings.