If Time Warner claims that net neutrality gives them slower more expensive internet, then they really don't have the expertise to conclude otherwise. And that's a problem.
As a result, the polls which are conducted show that the public doesn't want net neutrality. see http://heartland.org/policy-documents/majority-public-oppose... and http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2006/09/7772/
I think that the big players need to plaster ads on things like the google homepage which try to explain the concepts in simple-simple terms and why having it doesn't mean "slower and pricier internet" and additionally, that any complaints they may have about expensive slow internet is nearly 100% due to too-little and not too-much regulation of the companies which they pay for this so-called service.