Free software is a prerequisite for software to be "anti-surveillance" and I see no indication that Chadder is free software.
When people hear us complaining about it, they often think we want to avoid paying money for it. This is false, and a bad impression to give. That is the purpose behind making this distinction.
According to the free software definition [1], it's one of the essential freedoms:
>The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
Access to compilable code can happen in more ways than fully libre release though.
I think that is what the parent post to yours meant.