Based on the results of the investigation, it seems the sexual harassment / gender-discrimination allegations are bogus. What we are left with is a female employee who was systematically mistreated by the CEO's wife, and a CEO who was unable or unwilling to put a stop to it.

So what can we learn from this apart from the obvious deficiencies of said CEO and said CEO's wife?

1. Nothing causes more trouble at a company than two women who don't get along. I'm sorry to say this, and I know it's politically incorrect, but women are catty and it's very difficult to get women to work together without all sorts of drama.

2. Women in tech frequently play the gender card when their jobs don't work out. Whatever the reason for their resignation or termination, they are highly likely to perceive that their gender was a major factor in the outcome.