Is your argument that deep experience in Clojure is sufficient in determining FP/OO hybridization isn't a good idea or can't be done well? I didn't think that was in the sphere of Clojure's goals.
Everybody who hasn't should be learning Haskell, regardless of background.
Teaching somebody Haskell is faster than explaining why the 1,001 dumb things mainstream languages do are dumb. I don't want to waste my time explaining why null values are dropdead stupid when I can just show them "Maybe".
We can talk about where we're headed after that.
Another issue is that Haskell is somewhat weighted towards finance and they're a bunch that tends to be somewhat proprietary about their IP. Some exceptions (Ermine) exist.
Some notable projects that come to mind include git-annex and Parsec. Parsec has been preeminent parser-combinator library since forever.
Also: pugs, pandoc, gitit, Darcs, xmonad, Idris (same person that did whitespace, haha)
Recently? Cryptol. That's pretty major.
I'm building stuff in Haskell, right now. Specifically, the easiest to use Elasticsearch client in the world.
One was needed. Badly. The ES API's data structures were never specced out properly, just documented on an ad-hoc basis. The Haskell library I'm working on will, if nothing else, mean that there's a reference for how the JSON is structured.
Anyway, empower thyself, learn some Haskell: https://gist.github.com/bitemyapp/8739525
Edit:
Ah, I thought I knew that username from somewhere. The negative-nancy is Timothy Baldridge, an employee of Rich Hickey's company Cognitect. Cognitect is "the" Clojure company and represents the inner-clique.
On the other hand, I don't have to be a php'r to know facebook was built in that language or a C++ programmer to know what google has done with it.
The negative-nancy is Timothy Baldridge, an employee of Rich Hickey's company Cognitect.
By personally attacking a critic of your claims, you're only making your case weaker.
Personal attack? What personal attack? Are you reading the same comment I am? He identified someone. If identification amounts to a personal attack, then that would seem to indicate severe problems with the image of the person being identified!
Apart from the juvenile "negative-nancy", there's also the clear implication of ascribing untoward motives based on the person's identity.
Well, some projects document systems in MS WORD, you are using Haskell for documenting JSON structures. That's a step up.
Deleted comment
Programming language flamewar is off-topic and inappropriate for HN. The personal attacks are beyond the pale.
> haskell + smart programming practices guarantee a crash
> free experience.
Yeah dwm, crashes all the time.
Why don't you try another approach to functional programming, like http://www.shenlanguage.org/ ?
If you think Haskell is The One True Way™, get a new pair of sun glasses.