The same holds true for medieval Europeans and their all-natural diet.
Go look at some old suits of armor some time -- those guys were tiny, and they were the biggest, strongest men of their time.
The same holds true for medieval Europeans and their all-natural diet.
Go look at some old suits of armor some time -- those guys were tiny, and they were the biggest, strongest men of their time.
> those guys were tiny
Diet was hardly their only problem.
In terms of growth, it was definitely the major problem.
People did not evolve to get the majority of their calories from carbs.
Now, the "carbs are absolute evil!!!!" people do take it to an extreme, but it's just a fact that signs of nutritional deficiency (e.g., stunted growth) appear in the archeological record as soon as a group of people move from a high-protein, hunter-gatherer lifestyle to a high-carb agricultural lifestyle.
If there are any exceptions to this, I'm unaware of them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycemic_index#Disease_prevent...
But it's not at all clear if shunning carbohydrates is a healthier option in the long term, compared with a more diverse diet with similar total calories. As you suggest, there's considerable evidence that grains are not evil.
There is also reason to believe that a height in great excess of 6 feet is not optimal, however. Our physiology - bones and joints - don't allow for it.