If a developer works on something for no money, it's open source. If a designer works on something for no money, it's free spec work.
Developer culture praises open source. Designer culture seems to be vehemently opposed to free spec work.
If a developer works on something for no money, it's open source. If a designer works on something for no money, it's free spec work.
Developer culture praises open source. Designer culture seems to be vehemently opposed to free spec work.
The analogous situation for graphics design would be something like textures & Photoshop filters. Or icon packs. Or fonts. Which you can find lots of for free (sometimes even with useful licensing attached).
But who the heck is going to come do free graphics work for my new Flask extension when they don't even use Flask, or understand what it is, or have any motivation beyond "hey come do free work for me"?
On the other hand, you have cases like the current mpld3 logo update. The project's author asked for help with the logo on Twitter, and got 6+ solid responses back. People are glad to help if they have the skills to do so and if they're part of the project's community. Design vs. development is not relevant, only relevance is relevant.