Tell that to Matthew Shepard.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/14/matthew-shepard...
What is the "reason" behind being against marriage equality?
I find this a rational and sustainable position. No one should be afraid of losing their job for voicing their opinion in a public debate. No one.
Really? I guess there's no inherent problem with a homophobe or white supremacist coder, as long as he does his job and doesn't cause trouble at work. But a manager, who hires and fires, or a CEO, who is the public face of the company? It seems "rational and sustainable" to hold them to higher standards.
You know what? Let's amend the right to free speech so it excludes Mozilla CEOs, just to be on the safe side. Oh, and the next CEO better be a peruvian-aleutian lesbian just to show that the company doesn't discriminate (any more).
Or put "RonPaul2012" all over everything to appeal to your ilk? If you want to be a CEO, either avoid politics, or know that the people who agree with you have enough money.
People really need to have a better understanding of constitutional issues and applicability before they start running their mouth about it.