Not somewhere, pretty much everywhere.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/10/how-l...
I think your idea of how the case developed is fairly inaccurate.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/10/how-l...
I think your idea of how the case developed is fairly inaccurate.
> The order, issued under the Stored Communications Act, required Lavabit to turn over to the F.B.I. retrospective information about one account, widely presumed to be that of Snowden.
However you want to interpret his actions, there's little doubt that Lavabit's grief was entirely self-inflicted.