If you knew how to spell Matthäus, good, otherwise it was Matthew
"Over half of Russian migrants Americanised their names; only 4% of Irish migrants did so."
Not surprising, and I would bet the 4% consisted of Siobhans, Padraigs, etc
If you knew how to spell Matthäus, good, otherwise it was Matthew
"Over half of Russian migrants Americanised their names; only 4% of Irish migrants did so."
Not surprising, and I would bet the 4% consisted of Siobhans, Padraigs, etc
We found records of the origins of my family in the US. Their name was not changed at first, except 10 years later the first letter "I" got inexplicably changed to a "J." Considering how close a capital I can look to a capital J when written hastily, I gotta believe it was a clerical error.
It even mentions: " However, many last names were altered slightly due to the disparity between English and other languages in the pronunciation of certain letters of the alphabet"
Unfortunately their source [34] is a link that does not exist anymore at that URL
Password Must be 10 characters and begin and end with a number.
Yes, they actually mean exactly ten characters. And no, that's not has a number in it, that's begins and ends with a number.Also here is a third party search tool (that even ellis island website recommends over theirs): http://www.jewishgen.org/databases/EIDB/ellisgold.html
Oddly, even that third party form has an "old version you probably shouldn't use". (The link takes you to "gold". The old one is "white").
For extra laughs, take a look at the URL when you view the ships manifest images.
One is French Huguenot, though,and it's not so much anglicized as just misspelled. It certainly would have marked them as French, but I wonder how much of it is just chalked up to poor literacy on all sides.
In the Northeast United States.
I'm not sure how you could possibly anglicize that, short of adopting an entirely new name. "Sean" would be phonetically close, but Siobhan is exclusively feminine.
Slightly off-topic: I can't find a link, but I'm sure I read somewhere that Irish speakers in the nineteenth century would routinely anglicise their own names when writing in English: e.g., a man called Sean would sign letters as "John".
"Shavaun" ~10 per million in US census name information. "Shavaughn" seems similarly [un]popular too.
Also, https://www.facebook.com/pages/Amusing-Misspellings-of-Siobh....
All the "Siobhans" I've met seemed proud of their Irish heritage and history. Making it easier and losing the Gaelic "bh" seems a bit more lower-class.
I wouldn't think I could say the same. My work means I do spell the names of most people I meet, but certainly not all. I consider my spelling to be very good but even so there are names each week that I can't spell [correctly] and/or have never written before. Homophonic alternative spellings appear to be in vogue.
As it happens I knew someone for maybe 20 years called Siobhan before I learnt that was how you spelt it; if she was using a alternative spelling I'd never have known.