1930s immigrants who Americanized their names earned more
economist.com
economist.com
After changing his first name on his resume from a very Muslim-sounding name to an "Americanized" one, that changed completely.
Things are changing now, but I wouldn't be surprised if this bias is, at least to some extent, still evident.
I'm american, but my name is "Aram". This is not a common American name (Its more common in Armenia, and my dad is half Armenian). Im pretty much a European mutt.
People try to figure out who you are by your name. When I moved from Mass to NY for work and was meeting people I had worked with and talked to on the phone (who speak freely), I got three times "You don't look like an Aram". I asked someone what they thought Aram looks like, I was told more middle-eastern.
When I do a job search, I wonder if changing my name would make it easier. Being in tech helps though, people are used to odd names.
"The results of this study indicate a gender bias for both men and women in preference for male job applicants."
http://www.chicagobooth.edu/capideas/spring03/racialbias.htm...
I'm also skeptical how much value is added face-to-face. I think the long term strategy would be to apply big data techniques to hiring. If you do long-term tracking of hiring outcomes, you could start to develop a suite of accurate hiring predictors. It is clear at least some current selectors are not very good (e.g. gender, first name). I'm aware of an elite academic dept. that doesn't do face-to-face meetings for hiring assistant professors. Someone in the dept. claimed the application packet was the best predictor of the kinds of success the dept. hires for and face-to-face wasn't useful, if not misleading.
On the one hand, face-to-face does allow all these preconceptions and prejudices to happen. On the other, it allows the team to assess those things that actually matter in meetings, presentations, and other face-to-face venues.
Perhaps for a purely distributed company, this wouldn't matter. But in many existing cases, the face-to-face is still a factor.
As far as I know it works fairly well.
I still think you're not learning what you think you're learning from face-to-face. I don't have data on that, but then again, I'm guessing you don't either.
In the 1960s there was a joke in Readers' Digest about how Teddy Kennedy wanted to change his name because he was tired of being pigeonholed as Jack's and Bobby's little brother. So the judge asks him, "what do you want it changed to?" The senator replies, "Roosevelt."
It was rather surprising to me when I realized the number of people telling me I shouldn't be pressured into changing my name was equal to the number of asian/minority women that changed names giving me not so subtle hints about what they've experienced. It frustrates me a little. But I have friends from all walks of life and everyone from the minimum-wage-job-paying-off-student-loans friends to doctors and lawyers were all telling me variations on the same story from all different settings. They went from sounding like a minority like I did and just getting whatever treatment they thought everyone else got (i.e. it wasn't explicitly racist, it was just...average), to sudden interest and respect that lasts even after people realize what race they are.
I do find it sad the other "married" privilege I'm laughing at is that I could be wearing literally anything even a crappy tshirt and yoga pants sweaty after a workout at the gym, and people will treat me differently based on whether or not I'm wearing my ring that has a 1ct stone. Especially when I frequent a store and the same cashier or owner still doesn't remember me but treats me like night and day based on it every. single. time. The effect is even better than walking up to someone to buy lots of things and they're a bit snobby like "you can't possibly want this or pay for it" until I pull out a platinum amex or a wad of 100s from my wallet.
This is (among other reasons) why I try so hard not to make buttloads of assumptions and pass instant judgment on others - I don't like being on the receiving end, and we're all guilty of being on the giving end too many times.
Job wise my resume contains my birthplace and university education (which is from a "safe" first world country people usually think of a "white" - Israel) so if anything it must help (being seen as Jewish in Germany is usually more likely to get one "corrective" positive discrimination for obvious reasons).
Of course we can never know for sure which interviews we didn't get due to stereotypes so who knows.
But I'm sure I'd have gotten worse treatment if my name was obviously Muslim or African sounding.
Even if the effect described in the article is not conscious ("let me pay this person less, since he's a foreigner[0]"), I have no trouble seeing how it could happen (unconsciously), based on my own personal experiences.
My first name is very difficult for Americans to pronounce because (A) it is not phonetic; and (B) even a phonetic spelling would include sounds not common in English.
My last name is actually an Anglicisation of the original family name, so it's entirely phonetic. Even still people have trouble saying it. That one confuses me to this day.
The impact on my life of having a tough-to-pronounce name is usually subtle, but it's noticeable in minor ways. I can imagine that these would add up in the long run (perhaps not for every individual, but in the aggregate).
[0] That said, let's not discount the impact of being able to identify a person's race by his/her name (the original Freakonomics book goes into this a lot). I have a friend who has a very obviously Chinese name, and he started putting "US Citizen" at the top of his resume, because so many people thought that he needed visa sponsorship, even though he was born in the US.
Another friend of mine is white, but his surname also happens to be very common for Koreans. He's had a few funny interactions where he walked into an interview and the person was momentarily surprised to see a blonde, white man instead of an Asian interviewee.
[1] http://www.eiconsortium.org/reports/business_case_for_ei.htm...
Jimmy Carr:
"I got talking to a girl in the front row; I asked her her name. She said, 'It's Pataka.' I said, 'That's an unusual name. You don't hear that every day.' To which she replied, 'Actually, I do.' "
http://www.cc.com/video-clips/0miodh/comedy-central-presents...
Joke starts around 1:50.
In Quebec if you don't have an American name or a French name they might not read your resume.
Step 1) leave Quebec
Step 2) change your name in the other provice
Step 3) ... (return to Quebec, or wherever)
Step 4) Profit!
Source: I live there.
If you knew how to spell Matthäus, good, otherwise it was Matthew
"Over half of Russian migrants Americanised their names; only 4% of Irish migrants did so."
Not surprising, and I would bet the 4% consisted of Siobhans, Padraigs, etc
I'm not sure how you could possibly anglicize that, short of adopting an entirely new name. "Sean" would be phonetically close, but Siobhan is exclusively feminine.
Slightly off-topic: I can't find a link, but I'm sure I read somewhere that Irish speakers in the nineteenth century would routinely anglicise their own names when writing in English: e.g., a man called Sean would sign letters as "John".
"Shavaun" ~10 per million in US census name information. "Shavaughn" seems similarly [un]popular too.
Also, https://www.facebook.com/pages/Amusing-Misspellings-of-Siobh....
All the "Siobhans" I've met seemed proud of their Irish heritage and history. Making it easier and losing the Gaelic "bh" seems a bit more lower-class.
I wouldn't think I could say the same. My work means I do spell the names of most people I meet, but certainly not all. I consider my spelling to be very good but even so there are names each week that I can't spell [correctly] and/or have never written before. Homophonic alternative spellings appear to be in vogue.
As it happens I knew someone for maybe 20 years called Siobhan before I learnt that was how you spelt it; if she was using a alternative spelling I'd never have known.
It even mentions: " However, many last names were altered slightly due to the disparity between English and other languages in the pronunciation of certain letters of the alphabet"
Unfortunately their source [34] is a link that does not exist anymore at that URL
Password Must be 10 characters and begin and end with a number.
Yes, they actually mean exactly ten characters. And no, that's not has a number in it, that's begins and ends with a number.Also here is a third party search tool (that even ellis island website recommends over theirs): http://www.jewishgen.org/databases/EIDB/ellisgold.html
Oddly, even that third party form has an "old version you probably shouldn't use". (The link takes you to "gold". The old one is "white").
For extra laughs, take a look at the URL when you view the ships manifest images.
One is French Huguenot, though,and it's not so much anglicized as just misspelled. It certainly would have marked them as French, but I wonder how much of it is just chalked up to poor literacy on all sides.
We found records of the origins of my family in the US. Their name was not changed at first, except 10 years later the first letter "I" got inexplicably changed to a "J." Considering how close a capital I can look to a capital J when written hastily, I gotta believe it was a clerical error.
In the Northeast United States.
More recently, I've one or two articles regarding engineers having to add "Mister" to their resume with dishearteningly profitable results.
He's very proud of it, several generations later.
Edit (missed your other question): He pronounces it "Miller".
> There is also the problem of reverse causality. It is quite possible that richer migrants were more inclined to Americanise their name. (They might, for example, live in a richer area with fewer migrants, which might incentivise them to change their name to fit in). So, to establish a causal link from name-changing to wage-boosting—and here’s my favourite part of the paper—the authors turn to Scrabble. They calculate the Scrabble score for the name of each arriving migrant (the score of all the letters in the name) and show that individuals who decided to Americanise had higher Scrabble points. That finding soothes worries about reverse causality: it suggests that it was not the wealthier people that changed their names, but those with unusual names.
It still misses the homogeneous point though: Russia might have a lot of doctors emigrating for higher wages, whereas Italy might have had people fleeing as refugees. We'd expect higher skilled workers with hard names to adjust their hard-to-pronounce-and-therefore-hard-to-sell-services names.
It might be innovative, but I don't think it's valid. What if having a longer name makes your 30% more likely to change your name and being richer makes you 30% more likely to change your name?
The Scrabble metric would still show that name length is a factor, but it doesn't necessarily serve as evidence that other factors weren't in play as well. Selection bias seems like an obvious suspect here and this Scrabble discussion just seems like hand-waving to me.
So they all learned english, all speak like native speakers, and gave their children English names.
But those kids are now resurrecting the old dutch names. So, these Dutch immigrants, with english names, and english named children, have grandchildren with Dutch names...Willem, Berendt, Jannika, etc.
Sometimes things go full circle.
Even my compatriots have problems spelling it properly; in US I had my credit card re-issued three times due to misspellings and Amex doesn't allow as much characters on their card, so I mix my Americanized first name with an original last name. The only benefit of keeping it as is in US is when someone tries to call you in the crowd - "Mr. erhm... ugh... hmmm..." - is usually me. :)
Americanised, or Anglicized?
I have a feeling this variation by nationality extends well beyond Russian/Irish divide, where I live many people are of German decent (42%, next closest is Irish at 11%)and German family names are the most common. When I bought my house I noticed every party involved had a German last name and that made me take more notice in general.
As an immigrant myself, i would argue that those who have little existing financial foundation AND the desire to succeed - which is evident by act of immigrating - tend to be more successful overall.
Also, the hate for various groups (Irish for one) was pretty heavy with signs (e.g. "No Irish Allowed").
It is a myth that such signs were ever common.
http://historymyths.wordpress.com/2012/03/11/myth-82-signs-s...
http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm
http://www.cracked.com/article_18487_6-ridiculous-history-my...
I do take it we have forgotten about the "No Nothing Party".
1) http://msgboard.snopes.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_to...
I think the reason for this was also that most of the immigrants back then came from German speaking countries or countries affected by war, and since they didn't want to get associated with the former governments in Europe and first and second world war. Apparently they also earned more money with american sounding names which was even more of an incentive to change their names.
'Charles Taylor' is going to get more callbacks than his sister 'LaQuashandreka Taylor'.
i can say that i've never been discriminated against in a professional/work context, ever, and i think that has a LOT to do with it. probably all to do with it.
a lot of people think i was adopted. lol.
It could be that they have better wages because they're better at group cooperation.
The 300th time you have to say "spelled XYZABC", or the 300th time someone says "I'm sorry, what?" when you tell them your name, people tend to reach their breaking point.
I don't think I'd ever be able to change it though and tell a whole whack of people I meet to just call me Ben or something. It's too much a part of my identity.
I asked my mom once why we pronounced it differently and she told me that nearly every time she had to give her name for something, the person would ask her, "Wait, how is that spelled?" and after she'd spell it, they'd reply, "Ohhhh, Richard[said like the first name]." After a couple years of this she just gave up and started giving her name that way up-front because it was faster.