The *coin ecosystem need more than one implementation, a single codebase can't cater to all uses. I should know, I'm an Apache member.
The *coin ecosystem need more than one implementation, a single codebase can't cater to all uses. I should know, I'm an Apache member.
That's very different than the case where say 50% of the network is running bitcoind, and the other 50% is running btcd, and some transaction triggers an edge case in either implementation that causes one implementation to accept the transaction and another to reject it.
I think multiple compatible implementations would be great to have, but we don't have them at the moment, and in the meantime companies handling huge numbers of bitcoin transactions need a solution that works today. So I applaud the bitcoin-core team for catering to the increasingly common use case of using bitcoind only for consensus.
I do empathize with the need of solutions for today though. I was just thinking about tomorrow.